ABC and COVID-19

Learning Design in an Emergency 

In the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic emergency, academic staff from across the sector sought to maintain teaching continuity by moving themselves and their students online, doing what they could as quickly as possible with the institutional tools they had available.  For most teachers this was far from full, integrated ‘online learning’ but more an initial digitisation of their existing face-to-face methods. In own institution, UCL’s focus was on familiar platforms: Moodle for resource distribution and asynchronous communication, Blackboard Collaborate for online seminar and group-based activities and Echo360 Universal Personal Capture for short video recordings to partly replace lectures and instructional content The term we use at UCL is Teaching Continuity, emphasising the ‘business as usual’ elements for both teachers and students.

This initial phase is widely considered to have been successful at UCL, but students and teachers across the sector will increasingly demand a more sophisticated learning experience comprising richer, active and more effective modes of online education

As we progress, learning design becomes especially important. In order to develop true ‘online learning’ in even a simple form, courses will have to be redesigned around online activities. This is likely to be an opportunity to create richer learning designs, and for academics to consider a wider range of practices. Although academics may now have a motivation (albeit external) and focus, colleagues will still be stressed and time-limited, so any (re)design will require very simple workflows, step-by-step guides, checklists and so on.

At UCL, in the ABCtoVLE project and across the HE sector, the ABC ’sprint’ method of learning design has proved a well-evaluated, simple, engaging and productive practical framework to guide academic colleagues this process. As we know, the method is built around a collaborative and quite intensive 90’ workshop in which modules teams work together to produce a paper-based storyboard describing the student journey. The key pedagogical core of ABC is an operationalisation the six Learning Types framework of Prof Diana Laurillard (UCL Institute of Education). Using Learning Types has proved a remarkably robust and accessible route into teaching and learning discussion and reflection and shows how pedagogically-informed rapid development learning design is achievable.

The main issue is that obviously ABC was designed as a social, face to face, group-based activity, so we have to rethink how the ideas might be presented. Is it even possible to do a full course (re)design with academic teams in a wholly online format? Through discussion with the Erasmus team and UCL colleagues we thought of two options,

 (a) Minimal (non-storyboard) version

This is essentially an ‘abbreviated’ online workshop (based on existing formats from project partners.

Pre-workshop – things to be provided

Live session (Collaborate, Zoom etc) – approx. 60m.

  1. Participants identify the different types of teaching and learning in the course. This can be though a sharable document
  2. Discuss online options according to the choices provided.
  3. Make up a plan, identifying areas of support.

A list of key questions, to focus the participants on e.g. assessment, engagement, specific outcomes, what tools are supported can be provided.

Post-workshop

  • Circulate and discuss plan, support team to follow up.

(b) Storyboard version

What is missing in the abbreviated version is the timeline or storyboard, an opportunity to look at the whole course. We have been very impressed by the online ABC created by the dCELL team from Laurea University of Applied Sciences in Finland who kindly shared their approach using Zoom meetings. Their wonderfully detailed blog post ‘ABC went online and this is how we did it, provides workshop timings and links to Word and Excel support documents. Within the ABCtoVLE project, partners Sorbonne have developed a shared Google spreadsheet to let teams put the activities in a sequence. Several teams have looked at possibly more ‘lightweight’ tools, such as Trello (check out this Trello template from Allison Bell), Padlet and Miro to simulate the Storyboard. We have not evaluated any of these fully ourselves but are getting regular feedback from colleagues who are experimenting with these methods.

Technology

Institutional teams supporting ABC Online probably want to undertake a technological review before the workshops. What tools are available to teachers? The Tool Wheel is a quick visual approach, linking pedagogy to technology. As an example, UCL has developed a simple framework for Moodle tools.There are two stages that can be can be done in either order,

  • Sketcha ‘snapshot’ of supported technologies, comprising the VLE, videoconferencing/virtual classroom, media tools etc. using the App wheel template, the ‘wheel of opportunities’.
  • Make a list of the tools identified and link to local support documentation (videos, web sites, tool guides, ‘how-to’s etc) – can also link to external guides from Canvas, Moodle etc.

Practice

Another aspect support teams might want to share is effective local pedagogic practice using these tools. Again as an example, UCL has produced more practice-oriented list ‘take it further’ list. The latter was based on a sheet of distance learning options we often use in the ‘classic’ live ABC workshop when working with wholly online courses.

What next?

All these ideas are very much a work in progress, and we would love to hear if you have tried any variants of or of other approaches based on ABC.

Tweet @ABC_LD or contact us though this site.

Learning our ABCs: Project update on lessons learned so far at DCU

It seems safe to state that there are challenges in learning design that almost all institutions face: limited staff time, a modular focus, and a tendency towards ‘lone ranger’ thinking to name just some of the potential barriers to successful course design. These types of challenges have significantly influenced the team-based ABC methodology developed originally by Clive Young and Nataša Perović of University College London (UCL) which continues to grow in popular use worldwide as a model for blended learning design.

Dublin City University (DCU) Teaching Enhancement Unit is currently engaged in the ABC to VLE Erasmus+ funded project to further develop the ABC Learning Design methodology. As relative newcomers to ABC (DCU first experienced it in 2017), this project has been a great opportunity to apply the approach and benefit from the experience of UCL and the 11 other European partners involved. For those not familiar with the format, ABC offers a rapid-fire, hands-on workshop approach where in just 90 minutes academic teams work together to design or redesign modules and programmes. By the end of the process, teams have discussed, debated, and discovered a range of potential activities and technologies, communicated their overall vision of their course, and ultimately created a storyboard of an intended learning experience. Not bad work in under two hours, especially when it all goes according to plan.

The overall goal of this particular European project is to develop ABC as a downloadable toolkit that can be used and adapted by any institution. At DCU we have adapted the ‘classic’ materials to suit important strategic priorities such as flexible learning modes, enhanced feedback mechanisms, and Universal Design for Learning (UDL). Furthermore, by using the approach with several teams, evaluating it, and learning how different aspects perform on the ground, we hope to continue to develop our own expertise in using the approach in different contexts. We also plan to do our bit to promote conversations amongst the Irish learning design community about using and tailoring the method to optimum effect.

Clare and Mark facilitating at the ABC to VLE workshop with DCU Business School
Facilitating an ABC workshop at DCU Business School earlier this year
Workshop participants work on the 'Tweet' activity
DCU Business School participants work on  the ‘Tweet’ activity as part of the workshop.
Clinical Exercise Science Programme Team working on Storyboard
The Clinical Exercise Science Programme Team working on their Storyboard

What has been learned along the way?

We have not quite reached the halfway point of the project so this is by no means a definitive evaluation. However there have certainly been several lessons learned to date and from our perspective thus far it appears that:

  • The 90-120 minutes timeframe is a good ‘in’ for potential participants and seems to be a period of time that can be scheduled without as much difficulty as full or half-day blocks. Quite a lot can be done to develop a vision for a course within 90 minutes and it is very clear that the collaboration and conversation raises questions and ideas that would not come up were people to approach this as individuals.
  • A ‘pre ABC’ workshop is necessary (perhaps even mandatory) to enable teams to consider programme and module learning outcomes and help them prepare their thinking for the 90 minute workshop. Without an adequate preparatory phase, teams risk feeling unprepared for the various workshop activities and consequently may find it harder to deeply engage. This is particularly true for teams who have not yet entered the validation process.
  • Facilitating ABC workshops is challenging! Keeping to the tight timings while playing an active and critical role in the design conversations is not easy and the advice to have at least two facilitators for every session held true for us.
  • Access to follow-on workshops and supports is vital: The action plan formulated at the end of the workshop highlights areas that need to be followed up afterwards, such as further technology-specific training. Additional just-in-time supports and guidance are necessary to help educators implement proposed designs back in the ‘real’ post-workshop world.

What is happening next?

By September 2020, DCU plan to have released several outputs and we hope to continue to develop our expertise in the methodology over the course of the project. For example, we are currently working with a number of programme teams to develop case studies about how ABC has been localised and implemented at DCU. Initial versions of two case studies will be published on this site over the Summer. We are also creating a range of technology supports to ensure that those creative designs talked about during the workshop eventually become a reality. For example, a customisable ‘ABC to VLE App Wheel’ is being developed to provide access to practical guidance and videos on potential educational technologies within and beyond the VLE.

Screenshot from ABC to VLE App Wheel highlighting potential technologies relevant to the Collaboration learning type
Screenshot from ABC to VLE App Wheel highlighting potential VLE and other technologies relevant to the Collaboration learning type

But it’s definitely not just about DCU: given the scale of interest in discussions with internal and external parties, the project leads are very keen to establish an ABC-oriented Special Interest Group in Ireland so that anyone using the method can learn from the experiences of others. You can expect to hear more about this in September but if this sounds up your street, you can take it that the format will be webinar based (for maximum inclusivity) and it will be more of a swap shop than a talk shop. In other words a core goal of this group will be to swap experiences and highlight tips and ideas that might be useful for others to take on board. So if you’re interested in taking part, keep in touch with clare.gormley@dcu.ie and we will keep you posted.

DCU Project Leads: Clare Gormley and Mark Glynn, DCU Teaching Enhancement Unit